“We are dealing with a new political movement that has decided to use barbarity against democracy,” she said. They soon dispersed and the lecture went ahead, but the audience, which included professors and two university deans, was shaken, Sroda told Reuters, recalling the incident in February, one of a growing number since late last year. “Hit the red trash with a hammer, with a sickle!”. Security guards pushed them from the auditorium and they moved to an adjacent hall, waving fists and shouting a chant from the soccer terraces that compares opponents with Poland’s widely despised former Soviet overlords: Al Gore and John Kerry didn't get the same treatment.A demonstrator holds flares up as he taunts the riot police as violence breaks out at a parade celebrating Poland's national holiday in Warsaw in this Novemfile photograph. On Governor Sarah Palin's being an in "demand speaker", the Associated Press reminds readers she's "A Failed Candidate" - repeatedly in stories they publish about her.He implies that if you hold to traditional biblical values then you must favor slavery, the abuse of women, and persecution of Gay people. Lowell Grisham has written that if you embrace a thoroughly orthodox view of Christianity then you must be a fundamentalist, exclusionist, or simply ignorant or bigoted.Those who decry traditional Christians for being judgmental have judged them for being exclusionary in their views. Those who preach tolerance the most often don't tolerate those whom they feel are intolerant. They reject the truth of the Bible, turning instead to secular things that are culturally acceptable.Accordingly, when the United States acts in the world it most often acts not for good, but for evil. (Native Hawaiians will be added to the list if the Akaka Bill becomes law.) All are entitled to life, except for those whose hearts beat in the womb to liberty, except for those who require the supervision of the nanny state to the fruits of their industry, except for those who have made a certain amount of money and are obligated to hand a disproportionate chunk of it over to the government each year.Ĭentral to the liberal interpretation of history is the belief that a country founded on so flawed a philosophy cannot, as a rule, be a force for good in the world. According to the liberal interpretation, all men are created equal, except for blacks, Native Americans, Alaskan natives, Hispanics, and Asian and Pacific Islanders, who are racially challenged and must be classed apart from everyone else. In the view of those who subscribe to the liberal interpretation of history, the philosophy of the Declaration is antiquated. But by placing its principles in the Declaration of Independence, they preserved it, as Abraham Lincoln said, for all time, so that “to-day, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of reappearing tyranny and oppression.” The founders of the United States, it is true, did not always live up to their philosophy. It was founded by statesmen who subscribed to a deeply flawed philosophy statesmen who believed that all men are created equal, and that all men are entitled to life, liberty, and the fruits of their industry. The liberal interpretation of history holds that the United States is not merely a flawed country - all countries are flawed - but a deeply flawed one. National Review writer Michael Knox Beran put it this way: They have an exaggerated estimate of human capacities, a shallow view of evil, an inadequate view of truth, and a deficient view of God. Liberal revisionists vilify all things distinctly American.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |